ForgeOps vs. Sentry: what's the difference?

Sentry covers error tracking, performance tracing, session replay, uptime and cron monitoring, dashboards, and log management under one platform, with real breadth in each. ForgeOps covers most of the same ground, but its actual reason for existing is the row in the table below marked "Incident investigation workflow": by the time you open an issue in ForgeOps, it's already connected to the deployment that likely caused it, who it affected, and related signals, as one continuous incident rather than a log line you go investigate elsewhere.

Sentry's feature set as of this writing, from its own public product and pricing pages; check Sentry directly for anything time-sensitive. ForgeOps plan gating is on the pricing page.

Where this actually matters

If your team's real bottleneck is "we get alerted, then spend twenty minutes jumping between the error tracker, the deploy log, and a dashboard to figure out what actually happened," that's the specific gap ForgeOps is built to close: Investigation and Probable Cause cover how. If your team is already happy with Sentry's breadth and that isn't the bottleneck, there's less reason to switch, and that's a fair place to land.